Skip to content

Ideas and Feedback

Ideas and Feedback

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

4810 results found

  1. It would be helpful if agents could return more detailed hardware information, such as connected monitors and USB devices (external hard drives, printers, headsets, etc.). This would allow manufacturer names and serial numbers to sync with the asset inventory for better tracking.

    It would also be useful for the agent to associate the device with the currently logged-in user. If the device is reassigned, the agent could identify the new user and update the information in Atera accordingly.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Devices  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Atera would benefit greatly from a native Endpoint Control module similar to idemeum Endpoint Control.

    The goal would be to combine Endpoint Privilege Management, Just-in-Time Admin Access and Application Allowlisting directly within the existing Atera Agent.

    Key features could include:

    Remove permanent local admin rights from users
    Just-in-Time temporary admin access
    Elevate individual applications without granting full admin rights
    Technician approval/denial of elevation requests
    Policy-based automatic elevation for trusted applications
    Application Allowlisting / Default-Deny
    Audit / learning mode before enforcement
    Allow rules based on publisher, certificate, hash or path
    User requests for blocked applications
    Approval directly from the Atera console…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Agent  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. It would be very useful to have a lightweight, headless variant of the Atera Linux Agent that is specifically designed for Linux servers.

    The current Linux agent covers many important management functions, but for server-only environments there is no need for desktop-oriented features or remote desktop components such as Splashtop, AnyDesk, or similar tools.

    The idea would be to provide a minimal Linux Server Agent focused only on core server management functionality, such as:

    System monitoring and alerting
    CPU, memory, disk, network and service monitoring
    Patch management
    Package/software installation and management via APT, YUM/DNF, etc.
    Script and command execution
    SSH…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Agent  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Configure and send a notification email or trigger an alert when the asset’s warranty is nearing expiration

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Asset management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. We would like a way to provide managed customers with read-only visibility of remote access sessions performed by our technicians on their devices, without granting them Full Admin access to Atera.
    Ideally, this could be implemented through one or more of the following:
    A customer-scoped Remote Access Audit report
    Read-only access for customers to view remote sessions performed on their devices
    An API endpoint for Audit Logs / Remote Sessions
    Scheduled automatic exports or reports filtered by customer
    The information should include at least:
    Technician name
    Customer
    Device
    Remote access method (Splashtop, AnyDesk, etc.)
    Session start and end time
    Session…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Please consider restoring the ticket reply box to the top of the ticket view or adding a user preference to place it either at the top or bottom.

    The current bottom-only placement creates challenges when working on smaller screens and mobile browsers. Users often need to review lengthy ticket histories and then scroll all the way to the bottom to enter a response. This negatively impacts efficiency and makes ticket management more cumbersome.

    Allowing users to select their preferred reply box location would significantly improve usability and accessibility across different devices.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When tickets are created by a user, the system that is assigned to them is automatically picked. However there are problems with this setup. #1 Users can be using a different machine, say in a conference room that is the one that is having trouble. #2 The device in question is their CELL PHONE. Right now we have no way to tie a ticket to a device that isn't a computer, and we can only assign a device for the user that created the ticket. that is too restrictive.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Tickets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Est-il possible d'exporter la liste des clients comme nous pouvons exporter la liste des appareils.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Customers  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Est-il possible d'exporter la liste des clients comme nous pouvons exporter la liste des appareils.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Customers  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. It would be great to have a feature that allows administrators to exclude specific customers from selected users or permission profiles.

    A practical example: I would like to manage my company's internal devices through Atera and would like them to appear as a customer. I need full access as an administrator, but I do not want my technicians to view or manage those devices.

    While customer assignments can currently be managed through permission profiles, this requires ongoing maintenance whenever new customers are added. A "deny access to this customer" option would be much simpler, require less maintenance, and ensure consistent…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. On the ticket > products, when you add a product you can't refresh the page to you have to exit all the way to the ticket and back again before the new product shows.
    In the old UI, there was a refresh button to simple refresh all the products.

    This is yet another example of regression of the product. :(

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Introduce a technician-side To-Do List feature, to manage multi-activity tickets without exposing them as separate tickets in the Service Desk/customer portal

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Tickets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. When a user opens a ticket from the user portal with a dedicated Onboarding/Offboarding form, only one ticket is created. Internally, child subtickets are created for each activity (Atera lacks a To Do list). The customer side will see many open tickets and won't know which is the parent ticket and which are the child tickets.

    Consider:
    * View Parent-Child relationship in the service desk
    * Ability to filter only the parent ticket
    * Create a To Do List on the technical side to manage tickets with multiple activities that are not visible to the Service Desk

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. We use one automation rule to create Child tickets (subtasks) when a parent ticket is created from another department ( example Onboarding/offboarding), and a second rule to assign a technician to each Child ticket.
    The second rule never triggers, because Atera does not allow an action performed by one automation rule (creating a Child ticket) to act as a trigger for another rule. As a result, Child tickets are always empty and created without a technician assigned, requiring manual assignment every time.
    Please consider:
    * Allowing automation rules to trigger other automation rules, or
    * Allowing technician or other fields…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Tickets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. I would like to know in a percentage how many of my issues are fixed on a 1st time basis.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Tickets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. After a user leaves, I don't want to still see them in the site lists. Need a way to manage that or the site lists will get bloated with termed employees.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Tickets  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Hi Atera Team,

    Following up on our recent chat with Constantin (Aug 27), we'd like to formally submit two feature requests, as we understand these aren't currently supported but would significantly improve our workflow.

    1. Automatic Reply Sender Address per Technician Group

    We have multiple Support Addresses set up (e.g., knowledge@inc.com for our Knowledge Team, support@.global for Helpdesk Support), each tied to its own Ticket Automation Rule and Email Template.

    Currently, when a ticket is generated via a specific address (e.g., knowledge@inc.com), the automatic reply is still sent from the default outgoing address (support@.global), regardless of which…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. we would like to see an Atera agent for Chromebooks, it would be very beneficial.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Agent  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Please add a device availability status field to the Software Inventory report.

    The report should include an additional column showing whether each computer is currently:

    Online
    Offline

    The status should also be included when exporting or scheduling the report in Excel, CSV, or PDF format.

    This would make it possible to distinguish software inventory data received from currently connected computers from cached inventory data belonging to offline computers.

    It would also be useful to add the following fields:

    Last Seen
    Availability Monitoring Enabled/Disabled
    Folder
    Device Type

    Please make these fields available both in the built-in Software Inventory report and in…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Currently, reboot schedules can only be configured in 30-minute increments. Please allow administrators to manually specify an exact reboot time (e.g., 10:15 PM, 11:05 PM, etc.). This would provide greater flexibility for maintenance windows, patching schedules, and minimizing user impact.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?