- or
No existing idea results
- ~ No ideas found ~
4809 results found
-
Add new Custom Asset from Network Discovery
The Network Discovery function is a very powerfull tool. But in complex and not structured scenarios there are lot of "known" devices where it is not possible to manage SNMP configuration or instlla the Agent (ie. Bank credit card readers, Telphone carrier managed routers, Known guests-users' laptops, Fiscal printers, etc..). In these cases shuold be very usefull to select an Unmonitored device and add it as a pre-defined Custom Asset (or Generic) by automatically filling the existing fields (Device type, MAC, Manufacturer, etc..) to monitor on/off line status.
By adding this functionality it will be possible to have a comprehensive asset management solution and to focus only on new or unknown devices.
Thank you very much.
IacopoThe Network Discovery function is a very powerfull tool. But in complex and not structured scenarios there are lot of "known" devices where it is not possible to manage SNMP configuration or instlla the Agent (ie. Bank credit card readers, Telphone carrier managed routers, Known guests-users' laptops, Fiscal printers, etc..). In these cases shuold be very usefull to select an Unmonitored device and add it as a pre-defined Custom Asset (or Generic) by automatically filling the existing fields (Device type, MAC, Manufacturer, etc..) to monitor on/off line status.
By adding this functionality it will be possible to have a comprehensive…
10 votes -
Permission option to close other tech ticket
Currently there is a permission option to view other technician ticket but there should be an additional permission (on and off) for a technician ability to close tickets that don't belong to them.
SLA, time entry and CSAT are linked with ticket owner and tech should not have the ability to close ticket on behalf of another technician. Only team leader or Admin should have this ability. We want all our tech to view all tickets, as when a customer calls and if the tech is not available, they can provide update to client. But technician should be restricted from closing other technician's ticket.Currently there is a permission option to view other technician ticket but there should be an additional permission (on and off) for a technician ability to close tickets that don't belong to them.
SLA, time entry and CSAT are linked with ticket owner and tech should not have the ability to close ticket on behalf of another technician. Only team leader or Admin should have this ability. We want all our tech to view all tickets, as when a customer calls and if the tech is not available, they can provide update to client. But technician should be restricted from…5 votes -
2 votes
-
System to handle email notifications to copied recipients on tickets, not rely on "Reply All" from email client
No notification sent to copied parties on ticket if primary customer does not use "Reply All" when they respond to a ticket via email or if they delete email recipients from email response.
You cannot rely on the customer to click on "Rely All", if you do and there is another party that needs to be included for example an escalation with their manager or a "cover your butt side", they will not receive the communication reply to the ticket.
I have had a recent incident whereby the primary removed their manager from the "Reply All" email, so it wasn't sent to them. Upon liaising with the manager, I found that they didn't receive the last response and had no idea what I was talking about as they had been dropped by the primary user from the email.
To constantly check if "Reply All" is being used or to go through and configure Outlook clients to do this by default is a lot of extra work from the tech side.
As an example of how other systems work, accounting systems.
If I respond to the system's email, the email hits the system, the entry is made and any user that is attached to the invoice/ticket will be sent my response from the system. That to me makes more sense.With Atera there is no control of the communication workflow.
No notification sent to copied parties on ticket if primary customer does not use "Reply All" when they respond to a ticket via email or if they delete email recipients from email response.
You cannot rely on the customer to click on "Rely All", if you do and there is another party that needs to be included for example an escalation with their manager or a "cover your butt side", they will not receive the communication reply to the ticket.
I have had a recent incident whereby the primary removed their manager from the "Reply All" email, so it wasn't…
1 vote -
reminder
It would be nice to be able to add a reminder for non-important issues whenever I remote into a end user's system. There might be low priority items like "purge folder X after x/xx/xxxx." or "Reminder: This user has a static IP set."
As of now I'm using the notes, but it would be nice if I was somehow able to be reminded when I'm logging in so I can address outstanding non-urgent issues.
1 vote -
Approval for knowledgebase
Have the ability to set approval workflow for articles in knowledge base. Suggested status would be: "For approval", "Approved", "Rejected".
"For approval" and "Rejected" shouldn't be visible in customer knowledge base in customer portal, but "For approval" should be visible in internal knowledge base in Atera, for selected roles. Admin-roles should be able to see everything in Atera.Also be able to set who can approve and who can submit for approval, lets say for internal knowledge base Tier 1 technician can only submit, but admin can approve and reject. For customer knowledge base selected customer end user (preferably IT-manager) can approve articles together with admin.
Have the ability to set approval workflow for articles in knowledge base. Suggested status would be: "For approval", "Approved", "Rejected".
"For approval" and "Rejected" shouldn't be visible in customer knowledge base in customer portal, but "For approval" should be visible in internal knowledge base in Atera, for selected roles. Admin-roles should be able to see everything in Atera.Also be able to set who can approve and who can submit for approval, lets say for internal knowledge base Tier 1 technician can only submit, but admin can approve and reject. For customer knowledge base selected customer end user (preferably IT-manager)…
5 votes -
Better automation for tickets
More trigger options for ticket automation and the ability to set ticket field values based on keywords etc.
8 votes -
Remove required fields for technician
When creating a ticket as a technician, be able to override the required fields so that they are not required.
3 votes -
Automatically install ONLY defender security updates
Automatically install ONLY defender security updates so we can create a patch automation just for this. It would be super handy for clients who don;t have the money to buy paid antivirus and adds value to us as their support solution.
4 votes -
Bitdefender needs to have an uninstall password DURING deployment.
Bitdefender needs to have an uninstall password DURING deployment. I spoke with BitDefender and they said to allow local management and then add the password and then change it back to cloud managed. Not having this functionality in the cloud to set per customer is unacceptable.
4 votes -
Make a larger selectable area around the check box
A lot of spurious tickets and alerts get created and are intermingled among legitimate tickets and alerts. Selecting all, although easy, is out of the question. While clicking through several tickets and alerts quickly, the check box is easily missed. The check box size itself is fine, but it would be nice if the hot spot around the check box were larger.
1 vote -
New View
Looking for a new view option to see all tickets in our system and who they are assigned to broken out by users. Do not want to setup filtered views to only see individual technicians. In the ideal scenario each technician has a lane, showing the priority groups and the tickets assigned to technicians. One lane shows the unassigned tickets as well and can move them to the techs as needed. The issue I am trying to solve is visibility to the queue versus having to scroll thru the tickets to see things. What is happenign is tickets are falling out of sight and having to track them outside of Atera defeats the purpose of using a ticketing system
Looking for a new view option to see all tickets in our system and who they are assigned to broken out by users. Do not want to setup filtered views to only see individual technicians. In the ideal scenario each technician has a lane, showing the priority groups and the tickets assigned to technicians. One lane shows the unassigned tickets as well and can move them to the techs as needed. The issue I am trying to solve is visibility to the queue versus having to scroll thru the tickets to see things. What is happenign is tickets are falling…
3 votes -
Add double security to advoid delete devices in accidently
Would like to suggest when delete the device prompt asking to key credentials 1 more time to confirm delete it.
Current only have option prompt NO \ YES when delete the device , but some how wrongly click for human error. recommended add the 1 more layer when delete the device prompt key the Atera login password to double confirm remove it.
3 votes -
Active Directory on premises servers Users manage
we have multiple Active directory servers for diffrent diffrent customers nees to manage user count and other details
8 votes -
In Devices Screen add "Notes" Column
Add a column option in the devices list that shows the "Notes" custom field
1 vote -
Download Atera admin app on laptop or PC
Download Atera admin app on laptop or PC
7 votes -
comet backup
Comet Backup integration. Low cost, flexible billing per feature per device. Many cloud storage integrations as well as local storage. Ability to have cloud hosted or self-hosted for those who have their own storage infrastructure and need better control and compliance. Well rounded api. We've been using it for a few years now for our msp clients and it works well in our self-hosted cloud infrastructure.
5 votes -
Provide a working RMM client for Linux
The following page on the Atera website claims, "You can use AnyDesk on your Windows, Mac OS, or Linux device to connect to all your customer devices."
https://support.atera.com/hc/en-us/articles/360019885839-AnyDesk-remote-access
However, the only available client for Linux is AnyDesk and it doesn't work. I contacted Atera Tech Support about this and was told:
"We would like to bring to your attention that for the time being, our official support for AnyDesk is primarily focused on Windows and MacOS operating systems.", and, "Indeed, the documentation will be also reviewed and updated."
2 votes -
Ability to choose which alert will open a ticket
Ability to choose which alert will open a ticket
12 votes -
Axcient x360 Sync
Atera should include Axcient x360 Sync to the product offerings.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?