Settings and activity
104 results found
-
14 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
1,037 votes
Hi,
We wanted to let you know that your idea is currently under review by our product team. We are evaluating its alignment with our product roadmap and its potential benefits to our users.
We appreciate your patience during this process and will update you and the public status of this suggestion once a decision has been made.
Best regards,
The Atera Team
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
1,565 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
319 votes
Hi,
We wanted to let you know that your idea is currently under review by our product team. We are evaluating its alignment with our product roadmap and its potential benefits to our users.
We appreciate your patience during this process and will update you and the public status of this suggestion once a decision has been made.
Best regards,
The Atera Team
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
189 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
George Harb
shared this idea
·
-
28 votes
George Harb
shared this idea
·
-
110 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
75 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
61 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
381 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
71 votes
George Harb
supported this idea
·
-
1,587 votes
-
168 votes
-
298 votes
-
873 votes
Actually, this should be considered a defect repair more so than an enhancement request.
The issue is that there appears to be a one-to-one relationship between contacts and agents when it comes to tickets. Whenever an agent is changed on a ticket, that agent is then assigned to all other tickets for that contact. It really should be a one-to-many or a many-to-many relationship. Either that, or decouple the agent assignment from the contact when it comes to tickets.