Settings and activity
48 results found
-
2 votes
Michael Cain
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Michael Cain
commented
I'd like to be able to mark a device as an allowed exception to specific vulnerabilities. Maybe I have other compensating controls. Or the vendor just won't/can't fix it.
If I can catalog the allowed exceptions in the vulnerability scanner, there should be fewer false positive detections, and more actionable insights.
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Michael Cain
commented
I like the vulnerability scanner you've got going in Network Discover. It's a good start.
I'd like to be able to mark a device as an allowed exception to specific vulnerabilities. Maybe I have other compensating controls. Or the vendor just won't/can't fix it.
If I can catalog the allowed exceptions in the vulnerability scanner, there should be fewer false positive detections, and more actionable insights.
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
49 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Michael Cain
commented
The public IP address displayed on a device is helpful to know where the device is physically located. Maybe it's at a customer site. Maybe they are working remote.
Trouble is I have to memorize public IP addresses to figure out where the device is physically located.
This is helpful to identify Internet/firewall networking issue or if the user is in the building today.
I'd like to see the customer/site have a public IP (or multiple IPs) that would display on the device info.
Or do a reverse DNS lookup on the public IP and display that on the device.
That would help me know at a glance if the device is in the office, or remote, or what Internet connectivity I may be troubleshooting.
Thanks!
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
1,897 votes
Hi,
Thank you for your valuable suggestion. While we won't be implementing this idea in the immediate future, it has been added to our list for future consideration.
We continuously review user feedback to inform our development priorities, so your idea remains on our radar.
Best regards,
The Atera Team
-
948 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Michael Cain
commented
Yes please!
The alert "Value of OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.20916.1.9.1.1.1.2.0 is higher than 7000, value(s): 8362" is not as informative as it could be.
Would LOVE to be able to replace the OID string with something much more human readable.
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
1,487 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Michael Cain
shared this idea
·
-
16 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
132 votes
Congratulations on helping shape Atera! The
feature you requested is currently being
considered for development. Please be patient
as the process can take a while or even stall to
make way for other features. We
’
ll update you
once it
’
s been implemented and released!
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
333 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Michael Cain
commented
I understand WinRing0 is collecting stats on the computer.
Why does it have to be *installed* every minute?
We are working through some BSOD instability. Beyond the nuisance event logs messages, I'm concerned all of this high frequency driver maintenance activity might be related.
I wish I could alter the poling frequency to the driver would install less often.
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Michael Cain
commented
Oh, yes! An IPAM module would be great!
See address space utilization of each client.
Internal and public IPsOther examples for inspiration...
https://www.combodo.com/teemip-194
https://www.efficientip.com/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/networking/technologies/ipam/ipam-topAtera is already running network discovery so it already has most of the data. Just need to organize and display it.
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
Same think happened to me.
Yeah, the "verification..." error message is misleading.
Only solved the problem because a Google search led me to this feature request, which let me to solve my problem.
Thank you Andy Mills!