Settings and activity
52 results found
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
- Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Cain
commented
I'd like to be able to mark a device as an allowed exception to specific vulnerabilities. Maybe I have other compensating controls. Or the vendor just won't/can't fix it.
If I can catalog the allowed exceptions in the vulnerability scanner, there should be fewer false positive detections, and more actionable insights.
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Cain
commented
I like the vulnerability scanner you've got going in Network Discover. It's a good start.
I'd like to be able to mark a device as an allowed exception to specific vulnerabilities. Maybe I have other compensating controls. Or the vendor just won't/can't fix it.
If I can catalog the allowed exceptions in the vulnerability scanner, there should be fewer false positive detections, and more actionable insights.
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteMichael Cain
shared this idea
·
-
1,707 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
884 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Cain
commented
Yes please!
The alert "Value of OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.20916.1.9.1.1.1.2.0 is higher than 7000, value(s): 8362" is not as informative as it could be.
Would LOVE to be able to replace the OID string with something much more human readable.
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Hello, Thanks so much for submitting your idea! It’s currently under review by our product team, and should a decision be reached to develop it, we’ll keep you in the loop!
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
1,443 votes
Hello, Thanks so much for submitting your idea! It’s currently under review by our product team, and should a decision be reached to develop it, we’ll keep you in the loop!
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesMichael Cain
shared this idea
·
-
104 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
120 votes
Congratulations on helping shape Atera! The
feature you requested is currently being
considered for development. Please be patient
as the process can take a while or even stall to
make way for other features. We
’
ll update you
once it
’
s been implemented and released!
Michael Cain
supported this idea
·
-
323 votesMichael Cain
supported this idea
·
Same think happened to me.
Yeah, the "verification..." error message is misleading.
Only solved the problem because a Google search led me to this feature request, which let me to solve my problem.
Thank you Andy Mills!