Settings and activity
7 results found
- 
131 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 supported this idea
           · jded
    
 supported this idea
           ·An error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedURGENT: Technicians should be able to add time to a ticket without being able to see the rate of the contract or select the rate. This is important as right now there is no way for technicians to be able to log time without accessing all clients' contract rates, which are confidential. 
- 
26 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedI completely agree - there needs to be much more granular control of roles - they're currently not fit for purpose for an MSP. For example, we can't have a user with access to policy configuration, without making him a full admin and therefore providing him access to all the billing information. This is a security risk that needs a solution ASAP.  jded
    
 supported this idea
           · jded
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
14 votes jded
    
 shared this idea
           · jded
    
 shared this idea
           ·
- 
243 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedThis is very important to us. At the moment we are having to use standard tickets for projects, but there are no stages for progress/sign-off, we cannot crate tickets/tasks that fall under larger projects, and using the standard tickets for projects (that often are open for long periods of time) is skewing our support metrics such as average ticket closure time, which is very frustrating.  jded
    
 supported this idea
           · jded
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
56 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedThis is very important to us. At the moment we are having to use standard tickets for projects, but there are no stages for progress/sign-off, we cannot crate tickets/tasks that fall under larger projects, and using the standard tickets for projects (that often are open for long periods of time) is skewing our support metrics such as average ticket closure time, which is very frustrating.  jded
    
 supported this idea
           · jded
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
67 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedThis is very important to us. At the moment we are having to use standard tickets for projects, but there are no stages for progress/sign-off, we cannot crate tickets/tasks that fall under larger projects, and using the standard tickets for projects (that often are open for long periods of time) is skewing our support metrics such as average ticket closure time, which is very frustrating.  jded
    
 supported this idea
           · jded
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
138 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedThis is very important to us. At the moment we are having to use standard tickets for projects, but there are no stages for progress/sign-off, we cannot crate tickets/tasks that fall under larger projects, and using the standard tickets for projects (that often are open for long periods of time) is skewing our support metrics such as average ticket closure time, which is very frustrating.  jded
    
 supported this idea
           · jded
    
 supported this idea
           ·An error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedThis is very important to us. At the moment we are having to use standard tickets for projects, but there are no stages for progress/sign-off, we cannot crate tickets/tasks that fall under larger projects, and using the standard tickets for projects (that often are open for long periods of time) is skewing our support metrics such as average ticket closure time, which is very frustrating. An error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedThis is very important to us. At the moment we are having to use standard tickets for projects, but there are no stages for progress/sign-off, we cannot crate tickets/tasks that fall under larger projects, and using the standard tickets for projects (that often are open for long periods of time) is skewing our support metrics such as average ticket closure time, which is very frustrating. An error occurred while saving the comment  jded
    
 commented jded
    
 commentedThis is very important to us. At the moment we are having to use standard tickets for projects, but there are no stages for progress/sign-off, we cannot crate tickets/tasks that fall under larger projects, and using the standard tickets for projects (that often are open for long periods of time) is skewing our support metrics such as average ticket closure time, which is very frustrating. 
 
        
There needs to be much more granular control of roles - they're currently not fit for purpose for an MSP. For example, we can't have a user with access to policy configuration, without making him a full admin and therefore providing him access to all the billing information. This is a security risk for the business that needs a solution ASAP.