Settings and activity
15 results found
-
1,543 votes
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
2,248 votes
Hello, Thanks so much for submitting your idea! It’s currently under review by our product team, and should a decision be reached to develop it, we’ll keep you in the loop!
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesUTCL Administration
shared this idea
·
-
19 votes
Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesUTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesUTCL Administration
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesUTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
71 votes
Nice! The feature you requested is being considered for development. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
1,011 votes
Hello, Thanks so much for submitting your idea! It’s currently under review by our product team, and should a decision be reached to develop it, we’ll keep you in the loop!
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment UTCL Administration
commented
I see this is marked as "Planned" half a year ago. Any progress?
I can not begin to tell you how frustrating it is dealing with SNMP templates. Why would they show up in random order, and order that may change from day to day or hour to hour. Who would do something like that and say, "yup, that's what I wanted"?
It is imperative that sort order gets fixed on these templates. When there are many OIDs, it NEEDs to be in the order I say, not some random order.
I believe the ideal should be that:
a) Template order is the same as order entered. This means that what I see when initially making the template is how it will show on device.
b) OIDs in both the "OIDs Values" area and the "Monitored OIDs" area need to be re-arranged as required.
c) Sort by column or some other sort mechanism.We create templates in order to make all devices of a given device type and model the same.
For example, EVERY TIME I use the template I created for MS810 Printer, IT MUST display (among other things), Toner max impressions followed by Toner remaining impressions, IN ORDER. When you re-arrange things, it means that everyone looking at it needs to read the OID and determine what each value refers to, rather than having every MS810 different.Currently, your SNMP templates are next door to useless.
-
33 votes
Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment UTCL Administration
commented
I can not begin to tell you how frustrating it is dealing with SNMP templates. Why would they show up in random order, an order that may change from day to day or hour to hour. Who would do something like that and say, "yup, that's what I wanted"?
It is imperative that sort order gets fixed on these templates. When there are many OIDs, it NEEDs to be in the order I say, not some random order.
I believe the ideal should be that:
a) Template order is the same as order entered. This means that what I see when initially making the template is how it will show on device.
b) OIDs in both the "OIDs Values" area and the "Monitored OIDs" area need to be re-arranged as required.
c) Sort by column or some other sort mechanism.We create templates in order to make all devices of a given device type and model the same.
For example, EVERY TIME I use the template I created for MS810 Printer, IT MUST display (among other things), Toner max impressions followed by Toner remaining impressions, IN ORDER. When you re-arrange things, it means that everyone looking at it needs to read the OID and determine what each value refers to, rather than having every MS810 different.Currently, your SNMP templates are next door to useless.
I have asked for this at least once previously (before you moved this to UserVoice)
-
107 votes
Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
405 votes
Veeam integration is planned.
Thank you for helping us improve Atera!
UTCL Administration
supported this idea
·
-
288 votes
-
176 votes
Exactly what I am fighting with today.
How can I create alerts on an SNMP printer, when there are 3 potential sizes for toner containers?
Here, once again, is a request for the obvious.