Settings and activity
14 results found
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Adam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
Hi,
We wanted to let you know that your idea is currently under review by our product team. We are evaluating its alignment with our product roadmap and its potential benefits to our users.
We appreciate your patience during this process and will update you and the public status of this suggestion once a decision has been made.
Best regards,
The Atera Team
Adam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteAdam Lacey
shared this idea
·
-
2,295 votes
Hi,
Thank you for your valuable suggestion. We recognize this is an important request in IT, however we won't be implementing this idea in the immediate future, it has been added to our list for future consideration.
We continuously review user feedback to inform our development priorities, so your idea remains on our radar.
Best regards,
The Atera Team
Adam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesAdam Lacey
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
166 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
94 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
-
982 votesAdam Lacey
supported this idea
·
Along side of this there should be a way to label and select device type or name for all detections. Not all devices are Agent or SNMP compatible and will just sit in Network discovery unknown by all techs but if they could be labeled and filtered to identify them then enrolling tech could identify each and clear it from being harmful. This would allow tech later to have more information and more quickly know the network environment when events/alerts occur. Additionally you could add MAC address vendor lookup to identify the device further.