Skip to content

Settings and activity

96 results found

  1. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    So honestly, this is a major problem with most RMM providers. It's almost like they don't use their own product to manage their own infrastructure :-)

    The best way around this I've found is to use git. I setup my own git server (Gitea) that I use to store my scripts in a public repo. The script that gets uploaded to Atera (or whatever) is literally 2 lines. The Atera scripts just invokes the script from the repo. This has really improved life for me since changes can be made without touching Atera at all - I can update the scripts directly from VS Code and have them run live. I can revert to an earlier version, diff the versions to see changes, etc. And it's portable - so if I decide to move to another RMM provider, it's very little work to get the scripts moved over.

  2. 48 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
  3. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    Other scenarios include:

    Installing applications that require company specific information. Examples would include things like backup agents, anti-malware agents, Outlook extensions, etc. Associating scripts with a customer would eliminate the chances of incorrectly installing the wrong thing, and would really help to organize the scripts.

  4. 104 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    I agree. There are so many times when I'd like to work on a particular endpoint and I'll ask the end user to turn it on - but I then need to have the end user send me an email or something to let me know the endpoint is ready for me. This is cumbersome and shouldn't be the case with an RMM platform. I should be able to go to a device and create an alert the next time that device's availability changes from offline/unavailable to online.

    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  7. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under Review  ·  Nir Gilbert responded

    Nice! The feature you requested is being considered for development. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!

    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    10 minutes ago I received an alert for "7 failed login attempts during a time period of 5.00 minutes". That's all the alert text says. If I go to the endpoint, the alert section there reads the same thing.

    Naturally, I want to know more about the event log messages that triggered the alert. So I go to Manage -> Event Viewer to see more information. I navigate to the Security log and load up 500 events. I quickly find out that 500 events isn't enough, so I load up 1000 events and scroll all the way down but I still can't see the time and events I need to.

    This endpoint is a file server with ~50 users connected to it, so an alert that's 10 minutes old has more than 1000 events logged and is unsearchable in Atera.

    So now I connect to the endpoint interactively and load up a prebuilt filter in the Windows Event Log to see what I need to. Why not save time and bypass Atera's tools completely?

    The fix for this would be to include some context about the alert. Show me the event log messages that triggered the alert and the context surrounding them.

  8. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!

    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    I'd also like to throw in my feature request here too because I think it falls right in line with this one: https://atera.uservoice.com/forums/936306-ideas-and-feedback/suggestions/45844654-event-monitoring-improvement-v2

  9. 119 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!

    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
  10. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  11. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!

    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    This is becoming more important on a regular basis for me. New clients are often very surprised that there is no prompt or warning before letting me onto their system. I understand their concern. I think informing the end user of remote interactive connections is far more important than the inconvenient message box Atera added to the agent install process.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    N-Able had a really nice way to remotely connect to endpoints. In my case, I specified a timeout of 15 seconds and then it automatically connected me, but during those 15 seconds the end user was asked if they wanted to allow or reject the remote connection. Something similar in Atera would be great.

  12. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    Here's a good use case:

    If I have a client that has my full package, I'll want to make sure they have my anti-malware package in addition to the RMM agent. To do this, I'll want to make a group that automatically adds computers which do not have the anti-malware software installed. Now when an endpoint becomes a member of this group I want Atera to run a script that I specify (this would be to install the anti-malware software). This way, I don't have to worry about whether endpoints have the software because it's being actively deployed precisely when it's required. Set it up and forget it.

    This is such a big component of automation in the RMM space that so many overlook.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    These groups can then be used to bill for devices when generating invoices.

    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  13. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    Here's a great example of why this in important, and many of you have probably see this in your own environments...

    I recently turned on Atera's prebuilt Event Log monitors to watch for the event IDs associated with installing and uninstalling applications. I quickly found out that without being able to filter what actually triggers the alert, these were far too noisy. But more importantly, Atera is gathering the wrong information sometimes.

    Event ID 1033 is one of the IDs for installing new software when the event source is "MsiInstaller". But because Atera is blindly looking for event IDs alone, it's also getting event ID 1033 from the "Security-SPP" event source which has nothing to do with installing software. So if you've created or tried to create tickets from these notifications, you'll need to weed out the ones that are irrelevant. This isn't just inconvenient, it's actually supplying you with incorrect data.

    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  14. 604 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Nice! The feature you requested is being reviewed by our product team. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!

    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
  15. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  16. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder supported this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  18. 178 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under Review  ·  Nir Gilbert responded

    Nice! The feature you requested is being considered for development. We’ll keep an eye on the number of votes, and let you know if a decision is reached to implement. Thank you for being a partner in our process!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    It looks like Atera fixed this. Packages added to a Software Bundle no longer list the version of the package at the time it was added.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Yoder commented  · 

    For everyone confused by this - Atera will always install the latest version of an app from Chocolatey, whether the app is installed ad-hoc or added to a software bundle. Apps added to a software bundle are NOT version locked and the latest version will be installed regardless of the version listed in the bundle. I wish Atera would REMOVE the version number of apps in software bundles so it doesn't cause confusion.

  19. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
  20. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Yoder shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5